Report 01
Informix4GL Demo: assessment overview
Decision summary for eight components, four distinct findings and five unexecuted verification tasks.
Read this report →CSI assessment · Nine reports
CSI baseline CSI-IFX-2026-10-22 · 22 October 2026. Limited to the registered source set. Application execution and proposed tests were not run; source findings do not establish runtime behaviour.
The declared iText dependency supports an unsupported-family finding and a qualified CVE candidate. A target-dependent Java requirement and a declared-FC5 CVE rejection remain distinct; deployment, library use and all five verification tasks remain unverified.
Report 01
Decision summary for eight components, four distinct findings and five unexecuted verification tasks.
Read this report →Report 02
Declared dependencies, version evidence, missing artifact identities and the matching each record supports.
Read this report →Report 03
Qualified CVE-2017-9096 candidate, FC5-specific CVE-2021-20515 rejection and bounded search outcomes.
Read this report →Report 04
Unsupported iText family, target-dependent Java prerequisite and the limits of the Informix lifecycle lookup.
Read this report →Report 05
Three compact evidence graphs and a complete register of 22 source-mapped relationships.
Read this report →Report 06
Evidence-led sequence, reviewable outputs and separate disposition criteria for all four findings.
Read this report →Report 07
Five not-run tasks with purpose, work, retained evidence and completion criteria.
Read this report →Report 08
Seventeen dated source records, public reference links, eight bounded coverage outcomes and their limits.
Read this report →Report 09
Preserved dated states, provenance limits, scope of claims and requirements for later comparison.
Read this report →This Wayfinder CSI assessment is limited to the registered source set. Findings, inference, recommendations and evidence gaps remain distinct. It does not establish a completed migration, production suitability or functional equivalence.
Independent Harten analysis of the Informix4GL Demo source material. No maintainer endorsement is implied. The exact analysed upstream revision remains unbound. The source records do not establish runtime behaviour or equivalence between the 4GL and Java implementations.
Inspect the evidence and external lookups · Read the existing application documentation edition.