Wayfinder / Case study / Topic detail

Source-derived document; reported behaviour, inference and evidence gaps are identified in the text.

Return to: Hazards, Unknowns, and Backlog — topic detail

artifact and documentation contradictions

In this document

Hazard: artifact and documentation contradictions

The earlier fleet artifact characterized D4_Orders as implementing update and delete operations and characterized D4_Report as handling backlog and stock-list reports. The more detailed source review contradicts those claims: the relevant methods only display unimplemented-option errors. The corrected interpretation is that the options and labels exist, while the underlying behaviors are not implemented in the supplied range. E0010 E0012

The earlier artifact assessment also identified a concrete stock field-interpretation error, although the supplied text does not reproduce the erroneous interpretation in enough detail to restate it safely. The supported stock fields are those defined by P_Stock: stock number, manufacturer code, manufacturer name, description, unit price, and unit description. E0010 E0013

A stated contract-gap list names D4_Stock, ID4_Orders, Orderform, P_Items, and several form classes as omitted. Those files are nevertheless present in the supplied source range. The gap list should therefore be treated as a documentation or artifact-coverage description, not as evidence that the files are absent. E0012