Source-derived document; reported behaviour, inference and evidence gaps are identified in the text.
Return to: Deployment evidence
Deployment evidence
In this document
What is deployed where, and is that known from repository declarations or a verified runtime observation?
This view asks which application components are assigned to deployment targets or environments. The supplied evidence supports Java/Swing-oriented generated form artifacts and custom form-related classes, but it does not provide a repository declaration assigning those artifacts to a host, package, environment, or runtime target E0004 E0005 E0006.
The Informix-4GL and SQL material indicates a possible persistence or migration context, but no connection code, execution path, service endpoint, host assignment, or runtime observation is supplied E0004 E0006. Framework versions, repository metadata, and source artifact names therefore cannot establish deployment placement E0004 E0006.
Elements
No deployment elements are established from the supplied evidence. The evidence describes application artifacts and technology, but does not identify an evidenced deployment target or an assignment of a component to one E0004 E0005 E0006.
Relationships
No deployed_to relationships are established. The supplied material contains neither a repository declaration assigning a component to a target nor a runtime observation confirming deployment placement E0004 E0006.
Gaps
- No target, host, server, container, executable distribution, environment, or deployment descriptor is identified E0004 E0006.
- No component-to-target assignment is reported for the Java/Swing form artifacts, custom form framework, generated record classes, or persistence-related material E0004 E0005 E0006.
- The evidence does not distinguish build-time artifacts from runtime-deployed components E0004 E0006.
- Informix-4GL examples and SQL constructs suggest a possible database or migration context, but actual connectivity, SQL execution, and runtime integration remain unresolved E0004 E0006.
- No runtime observation is supplied; published analysis and source descriptions must not be treated as live deployment verification E0004 E0006.
- Follow-up requires deployment declarations, packaging or launch configuration, infrastructure manifests, environment-specific configuration, or an explicitly reported runtime observation that assigns each component to a target E0004 E0006.
Recovery limitations
- No supported relationships reconstructed.
- Required concepts not established: component, target
Sources
- E0004 — SHA256
a7fa93a436c487d708267db6e5038c7415b98377a56232869519d6206a15e7e9 - E0005 — SHA256
cfb82f0c080e892e5b3b987574f1d65c56b7570c8650880e99078a02ca651535 - E0006 — SHA256
caaf28b181903beefb938762690d58ef2027cc70e645ab30a05ee9158cf684c0
Harten documentation of the Informix 4GL and Java source repository, from the retained 17 October 2026 export. The exact upstream revision analysed is not established. Source findings do not establish runtime behaviour or equivalence between the implementations.
Evidence identifiers are retained for traceability. The underlying analysis records are not included in this public edition; credential values are redacted. About this case study.